Next: Slides with Reasonably Fine
Up: Presentation and Talk: Lessons
Previous: Delivery/Talk
Looking at the obvious differences side-by-side, downsides are made
more apparent. Shown on the left are a given slides at the very start
(draft); on the right lies the final version of the corresponding
slide.
Figure:
Use hierarchy, isolate distinct elements, e.g. author, grant number
|
Figure:
Do not jump to the 'meat' of the work too early (introductory slide)
|
Figure:
Avoid over-filling the slides, be concise
|
Figure:
Visual structure to be avoided; two-line bulletpoint are undesirable
|
Figure:
Simplify where possible, animate to make content traceable
|
Figure:
Use mathematical notation rather than be wordy
|
Figure:
Overloaded slides should be avoided; use space wisely
|
Figure:
Explanation to be expanded where it contributes
|
Figure:
Use the space available, but do not over-complicate or (mistakenly)
distort (referring to aspect ratio alternations)
|
Figure:
Shorten sentences without losing important facts
|
Figure:
Bulletpoints are worth using wisely, depending on the nature of a
problem's structure
|
Figure:
Adapt inserted slides to content, making it more adhesive and omitting
irrelevant details
|
Next: Slides with Reasonably Fine
Up: Presentation and Talk: Lessons
Previous: Delivery/Talk
Roy Schestowitz
2005-12-06