Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

iPhoto and the GIMP

  • To: r@schestowitz.com
  • Subject: iPhoto and the GIMP
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <roy@schestowitz.com>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:55:51 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:56:09 +0000
  • Envelope-to: r@schestowitz.com
  • Organization: Manchester University
  • User-agent: KMail/1.5.1
2.   At 4:11am CST on February 10, 2005, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
    Only days ago I read about how bad iPhoto is:

    http://jacken.dyndns.org/blog/archives/2005/02/06/iphoto-5-is-horrible/

    So is it true? Is it a resource hog? That would be one reason to stick to 
the GIMP which is inter-operableâ



3.   At 9:00am CST on February 10, 2005, Brent O'Connor wrote:
    Roy,

    As far as I know GIMP is a graphics editor which has both vector and 
raster editing tools. iPhoto on the other hand is more of your photo album 
organizer and that goes also for Picasa. I donât really think you can compare 
GIMP to either iPoto or Picasa because they are two entirely different 
things.

    And for vector graphic editing I prefer either Macromedia Fireworks or 
Adobe Illustrator. And for raster graphic editing I prefer Photoshop. I think 
GIMP is getting better but it still doesnât compare to what Macromedia and 
Adobe have to offer, especially if you are a design professional. But I think 
for the average Joe who wants to do a little personal photo and graphic 
editing GIMP is ok. But then again Iâm not sure I would recommend GIMP for 
the newbie unless they where on a budget because I think GIMP is actually 
just as confusing as Photoshop or Illustrator at first and why not learn 
Photoshop or Illustrator first since its so prevalent, it certainly looks 
better on a resume. Of course this is all just my humble opinion and $0.02 so 
take it for what itâs worth. :)



4.   At 4:51pm CST on February 10, 2005, Jeff Croft wrote:
    Yes, as Brent says, iPhoto/Picassa and GIMP are two very different things. 
GIMP is better compared to Fireworks, probably, or maybe Photoshop.

    GIMP is, in my opinion, a very nice open-source tool that has a lot of 
power under the hood but simply doesnât have the fit and finish of Adobe and 
Macromediaâs apps.

    As for your question about iPhoto â it is a bit of a resource hog. No 
argument there. However, it still performs pretty well and itâs hasnât 
bothered me much of iPhoto 4 and 5. If youâre in a low-RAM situation and have 
a huge amount of photos it might be an issue, but Iâve got a very modest 
amount of RAM (512MB) on my Powerbook and just under 6000 photos in my iPhoto 
library and it runs smooth enough for meâ




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index