That's a good point - newer isn't always better... I personally never
thought about it.
I guess we don't have to worry about it for 2.1, but in the future?
Is removing Kubrick from the core, but using it if it already exists and is
selected good enough? (assuming, of course, that Kubrick is replaced with
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wp-hackers-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wp-hackers-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roy Schestowitz
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:36 PM
> To: wp-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] New Default Theme in 2.1?
> ___/ On Wed 20 Dec 2006 10:35:00 GMT, [ Matt Mullenweg ] wrote : \___
> > Arthur Jennings wrote:
> >> Is there going to be a new default theme in WordPress 2.1? I
> remember some
> >> discussion back in August and September but since then, nothing.
> > Not in 2.1, but maybe after that we'll include a new theme in
> > to Kubrick. I think 2.2 will emphasize a lot of theme improvements.
> (Thinking aloud perhaps:) I wonder how you choose to handle
> theme changes in upgrades. With so many people already (or
> /still/) using Kubrick you can't just drop it. Also, if
> changing default themes, there ought to be some check during
> upgrade, ensuring that the current theme is not superceded,
> overridden, or replaced. This could get slightly messy
> because people don't like noticeable and unwanted changes,
> even if a few clicks revert back to old settings (e.g.
> Dapper->Edgy, XP->Vista).
> ~~ Kind greetings and happy holidays!
> Roy S. Schestowitz
> http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
> http://othellomaster.com >> GPL-licensed 3-D Othello
> http://iuron.com >> proposing an Open Source, non-profit search engine
> Open Source journalism contributer @ http://newassignment.net
> Joint Editor @ http://boycottnovell.com
> wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers mailing list