If I may chime in, here, I have to second Matt's request. As interesting as I find this whole discussion, it would be far more illuminating with practical examples of the do's and don't's associated with each version of the GPL license. The thread is otherwise getting a bit vague and conceptual, lacking specificity.
OK, popcorn's done popping. . . Ready? Set? Proceed!
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:25:34 -0600
>From: Matt Mullenweg <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] WordPress and GPLv3
>To: wp-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Message-ID: <4773617E.4040800@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Otto wrote:
>> I am very much against the GPLv3 in general, and its application to
>> WordPress in specific.
>
>What would be some use cases in WordPress that are currently possible
>but wouldn't be under GPLv3?
>
>--
>Matt Mullenweg
> http://photomatt.net | http://wordpress.org
>http://automattic.com | http://akismet.com
_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
|
|
