__/ [James Helliwell] on Sunday 11 December 2005 14:26 \__
> David wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC), James Helliwell
>> <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What do you all use to monitor? I know iv asked this before.
>>>
>>>I havnt found anything I like! Id like a nice graph :)
>>>
>>>that googlerankings wesite is ok but slow and often a bit out? the small
>>>bits of sofware I have I dont like... What do you use?
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>James
>>
>>
>> http://www.digitalpoint.com/tools/keywords/
>>
>> And it's free.
>>
>> David
That's actually a useful tool. You mentioned it before, but I didn't both-
er to register with the site. I wonder if it's of any use for many arbi-
trary results pages. I guess it's mainly of interest to commercial sites
whose scope is narrower and visitor-to-profit ratio is quite high.
> Yeh Cheers Dave, is that what you use?
>
> I think tha is what I will use and am using. I think im doing ok bit
> pissed at the moment I spent somem £ on wordtracker just to find out
> it's US based...
Was that mentioned in the fine prints when you purchased a licence? If
not, perhaps you can get a refund, arguing that it must be stated to the
prospective customer. Many businesses make money out of ambiguities.
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:50pm up 23:58, 18 users, load average: 0.25, 0.37, 0.37
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
