Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: OT - email munging

  • Subject: Re: OT - email munging
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:58:02 +0100
  • Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.win2000
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Manchester University
  • References: <3jnv2rFpurfkU3@individual.net> <93ted19vfqmjpc3id9t3eskb4e8mtvo5cm@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
Anthony R. Gold wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:11:00 +0100, "John Burke" <john_burke@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I subscribe to a very low traffic regional newsgroup and I'd like to know
>> more about an obscene message recently posted there and the consequences
>> of replying to it.
>>
>> 1.
>> <extract from header>
>>
>> From: Theresa Milligan <ancient-of-days@0.0.0.0.co.uk>
> 
> From Google it is clear that whatever you saw had been posted blindly to
> many different newsgroups:
> 
> http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=r&hl=e...
>
> What has this question go to do with the Windows operating system?  Or are
> you just learning to emulate Theresa Milligan?
> 
> Tony

This is probably an nntp://uk.net type of question. Windows cannot be
considered the catalyst for spam, but some might argue that the contrary is
true. Maybe the Web servers which were susceptible to this junk and routed
the message ran Windows. Who knows...

Roy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index