Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Dashed Line using Header

  • Subject: Re: Dashed Line using Header
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:59:21 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.html
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Manchester University
  • References: <OI9Be.2917$uo6.2364@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com> <db39q2$215e$2@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <gIaBe.2920$uo6.2870@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com> <db3e30$228u$2@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <pan.2005.> <BEFBDDCE.14744%dorayme@optusnet.com.au> <db4kh8$2ceb$2@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <pan.2005.>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
JDS wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:00:39 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> Thanks for supporting my suggestion. I sometimes feel reluctant to
>> suggest something that's not perfect. A Mr. Know-all would come out with
>> some fuckwit comment and tear other people's suggestions apart. I think
>> Beauregard was quite polite though.
>> Roy
> Roy, your suggestion is not just "not perfect" but has actualy valid
> reasons for not being a Good Idea(TM).

I know. Did I not admit that when I made the suggestion in the first place?

> Don't feel reluctant for suggesting something that's not perfect.  Your
> suggestion would work, right?  I was just pointing out reasons why I
> thought it didn't seem like such a good idea.
> As for polite, fuck polite. This is Usenet.  I wasn't particularly
> IMpolite, though, was I? In fact, I actually thought I was on the cusp of
> politeness, mitigated by straightforwardness that resulted in the
> appearance of impoliteness.

Wait, wait... what I said is that you were _polite_ (unlike several others).
Check the thread again to see where the misunderstanding lies.

> At least that's my take on it.
> I still say your idea of using <H6> sucks.

I know! *smile* I never had it appear in public pages.


Roy S. Schestowitz

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index