Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Definitely link. That's what the Web is about, as long as your links are
> justifiable. One of the wonderful things about the World Wide Web is that
> you get contextual networks or channels. If nobody links, all that we get
> is a bunch of islands whose only meaningful entities are metadata and
> domain names. A site that has no external links will sooner or later be
> considered a secluded, uninteresting source. Search Engines will have no
> inclination to favour egocentric sites.
Yup, I would say: link to sites that provide (very) relevant extra info to
your visitors.
I have sometimes the impression that people over SEO: they count the exact
number of keywords, the density, the number of links, the number of lines
before the content starts, etc, etc. Mostly based on rumours, and wrong
ideas. A waste of valuable time which often could be used to write another
page with good content, or adding a few interesting links.
Moreover, at a next update such a very fine "tuned" site can drop to
position #993 and it's game over.
--
John Perl SEO tools: http://johnbokma.com/perl/
Experienced (web) developer: http://castleamber.com/
Get a SEO report of your site for just 100 USD:
http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-help.html
|
|
