Borek wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:30:24 +0200, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:
>
>> The changes on mine still hold.
>
> I am still tracing:
>
> on June 11th
> 9:49 9 DC
> 17:22 14 DC
> 20:16 17 DC
> 00:08 26 DC
> 01:52 14 DC
> on June 12th
> 10:16 9 DC
> 17:02 15 DC
> 17:39 13 DC
>
> It doesn't make any sense for me. But it seems that it may be still
> part of Burbon, as my SERPS dance too.
Stacey wrote:
> It makes sense to me. That is how Google is and always has been.:-) They
> are very strange and your backlinks never make sense with them. Don't
> worry about them, as you will never know what they are counting
I have no clue either. I see sites with a very high PageRank and barely any
valuable inbound links. Just to clarify, I never really trace backlinks. I
have a quick look at the values when updates take place, but I have no idea
how things are weighted. I know that up is good and down is bad. *smile*
>> I worked on a cron job this morning, but eventually failed. I also
>> discovered that Google will deny any request from wget and throw error
>> 403.
>
> Can you modify headers send by wget? I believe you can add headers, but
> then all I know about wget is that it exists (which is about the same
> amount of knowledge I have about cron :( )
I don't think I can the headers (then again, it's Open Source) and I don't
think anybody likes wget, let alone wget in disguise. Let's just say that
cron jobs and wget change my life completely.
If you want two practical examples:
-http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/01/30/mass-dowloading-music/
-http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/03/08/cron-based-backup/
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com
|
|
