__/ [Lissi] on Monday 17 October 2005 15:05 \__
> On 17 Okt 2005 the suspect Roy Schestowitz said:
>
>> What if the hack was requested by the tester for the sake of defence
>> from real attack? That what white-hats are for. My sites came under
> [snip]
>
> Look at the OP's headers.
From:Publilev <levpubli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups:alt.hacker
Subject:Can you hack our web?
Date:Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:Publilev
Lines:4
Message-ID:<Xns96F0F0E73A0D9abrete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host:152.red-83-45-6.dynamicip.rima-tde.net
X-Trace:nsnmrro2-gest.nuria.telefonica-data.net 1129412448 22307 83.45.6.152
X-Complaints-To:usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NNTP-Posting-Date:Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:Xnews/5.04.25
Xref:news.mcc.ac.uk alt.hacker:191963
no references
Am I missing something? I can't see anything fishy unless you were referring
particularly to "Subject Line", in which case I can take your point.
>> ...But I agree with the responder who said that it's not free labour
>> and should hence be paid for...
>
> That, too.
Some people think of hacking as a game or an afternoon activity. They have
watched too many films, I suppose, if they expect script kiddies to work
for free upon demand.
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: Sharks are immune to cancer
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 74572E8E
4:15pm up 53 days 4:29, 4 users, load average: 0.35, 0.38, 0.37
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
