Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: A proof that the "vulnerabilities share" is a function of market share?

  • Subject: Re: A proof that the "vulnerabilities share" is a function of market share?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:58:53 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <ds8ni15bn1gke4096koffib4k0b2vthkuv@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [OK] on Saturday 17 September 2005 06:06 \__

> 
> FireFox vulnerabilities: 40
> FireFox exploits: 11
> 
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=103

Vulnerability != Compromise/attack.

As long as Firefox remains a strong and ambitious minority, it will continue
to offer its user much better security. Note that I leave productivity and
robustness aside in this argument. Interestingly, you quote only those
numbers that suited you. Allow me to fill a gap:

"In April-September timespan there were 6 exploits for MSIE, 11 for
Firefox."

I haven't yet heard of anyone who came under fire when using Firefox. I
should point out what most people whom I know use Firefox.

You want to use Explorer? Suit yourself. Firefox doesn't work for you? Well,
then it must suck to be in your shoes.

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | Useless fact: Florida is bigger than England
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux    |     PGP-Key: 74572E8E
  6:50am  up 22 days 19:04,  2 users,  load average: 1.22, 0.85, 0.87

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index