Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Alexa (Moving to Live.com?)

__/ [ DJ ] on Saturday 29 April 2006 18:46 \__

> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:6459058.iugK3BSlLl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> __/ [ DJ ] on Saturday 29 April 2006 08:25 \__
>>> Not really a big issue but Alexa / A9 doesn't seem to use google anymore?
>> Blimey! You're quite right. I can see the gross degradation in terms of
>> the
>> relevance of results, having used A9 several times in the page. Why would
>> they give up Google? Either Google have something against them (the image
>> search component suggests otherwise) or somebody paid a decent sum of
>> money
>> to have things changed.
>> I suspect the latter is true:
>>        Is Microsoft Preparing a Big Attack?
>> The context for this article: taking aim at Google. They invest a billion
>> or
>> two in this, I suspect.
>> Best wishes,
>> Roy
> Looks like it taking msn results - a big step backwards for Alexa - msn
> results in my opinion are pretty poor compared with google.

You encouraged me to write about it, eventually <
>. Thanks for the heads-up.

I used to recommend A9 for those with high-speed connections I quite liked
the image view (reminds me of < http://bettersearch.g-blog.net/ >), which
complemented the SERP that was a Google twin with extra widgets (site info,
related sites, traffic ranks, etc.). Without quality results (deep,
inquisitive, as oppose to shallow), I might as well just stick with
Wikipedia/Google/Scroogle. Wait until deploration among A9 loyals begins.

I happened to notice that A9 are finally doing some Wikipedia harvesting as
well (albeit it's optional).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index