Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Op-Ed] Steven Vaughan-Nichols: Open-source Vista

__/ [ John A. Bailo ] on Thursday 27 April 2006 16:34 \__

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> How to get Vista back on track: open source it
>> 
>> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS4486500315.html
> 
> The thing is, exactly what "big secrets" does Microsoft have to protect
> in OS technology today?
> 
> If M$ opened its code, would a Linux kernel programmer, or X.org
> programmer learn anything that there were not already well aware of?

There will no longer be a need to reverse engineer some made-up and/or
extended protocols. That's what Samba, for example, needed plenty of effort
to produce.

At some stage, Microsoft offered to sell their source code to developers for
a very high price (entry barrier). This code, joint with
too-elaborate-to-be-valuable documentation, was their answer to the EC's
demands. From a glance at the code, it was evident it was too messy to be
valuable, as well. Only later did we discover that 60% of the code in Vista
needs to be re-written, according to Microsoft.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux    ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  5:40pm  up   0:45,  11 users,  load average: 1.09, 0.87, 0.75
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index