__/ [ John Bokma ] on Monday 07 August 2006 06:28 \__
> <usenet2006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> According to yourcache.com, on of my sites had this...
>>
>> 13 July - About 10K pages listed
>>
>> 27 July - 9500 listed on a few datacentres, but less than 1K on
>> most.
>>
>> 7th August - "-1" on several, 10K on some datacentres, and 100K
>> (yes, one hundred thousand) on others.
>>
>> Anybody else seeing this?
>
> site: doesn't work correctly. Has been fubar for quite some time now, I
> get still 10,000+ pages. I wish, since then I would have 30,000+ visitors
> :-D.
I have recently been running a lot of parallel lookups for
number of indexed pages. I was using Darren's useful script,
which probes dozens of datacentres in turn. I tried a page
count yesterday, having read the OP's post. It's still
unstable and not so encouraging.
Ever since that/those blackhat/s with 10 billion subsites
hit the Web I have never been able to 'recuperate'. Google
hasn't indexed as much, nor has it delivered as many
referrals since. That all began around March this year (some
Webmasters got dropped earlier). All in all, I agree with
John. Just ignore these numbers, but things appear to
stablise gradually. Still inconsistent and still awkward
nonetheless... blame the blackhats that knocked Google's off
balance.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Programmer: a device to convert coffee beans into code (Paul Erdos slant)
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 18.4% user, 2.7% system, 0.7% nice, 78.2% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
