Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Open Darwin Successor

  • Subject: Re: Open Darwin Successor
  • From: "George Ellison (undercover)" <notamisfit1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 7 Aug 2006 20:05:40 -0700
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <1563351.chzBt9OTcF@schestowitz.com>
  • Injection-info: 75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.77.66.7; posting-account=16uFrAwAAADIwWYTtngH1NReBA0iP-s-
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <h8SBg.62708$68.30142@fe55.usenetserver.com> <1563351.chzBt9OTcF@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: G2/0.2
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1137962
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ yttrx ] on Tuesday 08 August 2006 02:53 \__
>
> > http://macosforge.org/
> >
> > Told ya, again.
>
>
> < Re: Intel kernel sources available once again >
>
> __/ [ yttrx ] on Tuesday 08 August 2006 02:51 \__
>
> > http://kernel.macosforge.org/
> >
> > Told ya.
>
>
> Thanks for the heads-up. That's all very nice to see and it serves as
> evidence that contradicts Microsoft's claim that closed kernels are the
> preferable way (e.g. for security purposes). Moreover, as we watch
> Microsoft's reluctance to disclose source (let alone specification for
> Windows networking), it becomes evident that trapdoors exist and Microsoft
> is hiding stuff. Mac OS X does not. Even the recent claims that OS X phones
> home were tight to a Widget application. So how long before someone gets the
> source and makes available Tiger/Leopard to /any/ x86-based machine?

And how long after that before Apple has another hissy fit and tries to
shut them down?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index