__/ [ John Bokma ] on Wednesday 09 August 2006 22:02 \__
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Such situations are among the raison d'etre of designing with
>> standards.
>
> Recommendations, drafts, standards *depeding* on which document are using.
>
> If you work according to the recommendations/drafts of W3C you know that
> the recommendations/drafts are called recommendations/drafts.
>
> For example, most people stating that they use the CSS standard actually
> use the CSS 2.1 *working draft* [1].
>
> Calling it a standard means that you (not as you personal) haven't been
> reading the document as good as you try to suggest by calling it a
> standard :-)
>
>
> [1] meaning: it's under construction, the current date shows:
> 11 April 2006
You're right. I have not read it. Thanks for the heads-up.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Signature pending approval"
http://Schestowitz.com | Open Prospects ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 133 total, 1 running, 131 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie
http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
|
|
