Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Security

Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> __/ [ Hadron Quark ] on Saturday 12 August 2006 11:51 \__
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> __/ [ Gubo Dangle ] on Saturday 12 August 2006 03:11 \__
>>>
>>>> Hadron Quark formulated on Saturday :
>>>>> OK.  Heres a question.
>>>>>
>>>>> We all love the GNUs/KDE/Gnome/mishmash of our choice sat on top of the
>>>>> Linux Kernal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: Why does Gnome let you hit "delete/backspace" when entering a
>>>>> password yet the sudo command in bash counts it as a legitimate password
>>>>> try?
>>>>>
>>>>> Over to us all to discuss it.
>>>>>
>>>>> (Oh, and Kier, please dont say "choice").
>>>> 
>>>> You haven't got your keyboard configured correctly. Gome's/KDE/X all
>>>> handle keyboards through their own means. bash does it for itself too.
>>>> 
>>>> Stupid, but that's Linux for you....
>>>
>>> Actually,  it's  more about inconvenience than it  is  about
>>> security  (as the subject line arguably suggests). One ought
>>> to  argue  that Windows XP is less secure because the  login
>>> screen  diplays  dots for each character entered.  In  GNOME
>>> (e.g.  Ubuntu),  I believe this is the default behaviour  as
>>> well. With KDE, there's an option: no indicators, 1 star for
>>> each  character, or 3 stars per character entered, IIRC.  In
>>> the  third case (the one I stick to), this makes the  number
>>> of characters entered harder to count. If someone looks over
>>> your shoulder, then perhaps listening to the taps would deem
>>> reasonable.  This still won't compensate for faking  strokes
>>> and  backspacing  though. Invisibility is the  best  option.
>>> Keyboard   issues   in  bash  seem  to  suggest   that   the
>>> distribution  is  badly  configured or semi-baked.  I  doubt
>>> Ubuntu  will  have  this problem 'out of  the  box',  unless
>>> something went awry in the configuration stage.
>> 
>> I'll ask you again : why do you feel the need to be the only person in
>> the work to right justify *some* of your posts. It is ugly & unintuitive
>> to read because of variable spacing. Please tell.
>
> I'll have to remember not to do that when you are involved in the thread. I
> tried to remember. Justifiaction is just CTRL+ALT+7 away and I think it
> looks okay. I have seen other who do the same. As for hyphenation, I
> used to

Who? You are the only poster I have ever seen who does it - and it
simply makes no sense. English is single spaced and reads from right to
left.


> have that enabled until I realised it had been causing real problems.
> Anyway, sorry about that...

No need to apologise : I was just interested as to why you wanted to do
it - its not easy to read and is totally non standard.

>
> Best wishes,
>
> Roy
>
> -- 
> Roy S. Schestowitz  
> http://Schestowitz.com  |  SuSE GNU/Linux   Â     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
>          run-level 5  Jul 20 12:15                   last=S  
>       http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine

-- 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index