On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:43:44 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>About as helpful as most of their offerings. It says this about
>www.crystal-liaison.com (something like 60,000 plus pages)
>
>-------------------------
>Indexing summary:
>
>Pages from your site are included in Google's index. [?]
>Googlebot last successfully accessed your home page on Aug 20, 2006 .
>Potential indexing problems:
>
>We do not know about all the pages of your site. You can submit a
>Sitemap to tell us more about your site.
>---------------------
>
>Which sounds perfectly reasonable except they already have a series of
>sitemaps all submitted and all given the OK. So, why would it appear
>that they don't know about all the pages in my site?
>
>It's all a bit half-arsed.
You expect a PR2 home page to be able to feed enough link benefit for
Google to index 60,000 affiliate pages? That's funny :-)
The site looks filtered (mostly Supplemental Results)
http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&rls=EGLC%2CEGLC%3A2006-13%2CEGLC%3Aen&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.crystal-liaison.com%2F
just like every second affiliate site using a feed (or equivalent) I
own.
Trust me on this bill, you won't learn anything about Google from that
domain other than Google doesn't like affiliate content and it's
getting much better at finding and removing it.
If the site is doing as badly in Google as mine do when they are
supplemental the only way to turn the domain around is to remove the
affiliate content, add unique content and wait. Since Yahoo and MSN
are rubbish at spotting affiliate content you still get traffic from
them, so domains like that aren't a complete waste of resources (don't
waste too much PR on it though).
David
--
Totally Duh! http://www.totallyduh.com/
SEO Services http://www.seo-gold.com/expert-seo-consultant.php
|
|
