On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:48:54 +0200, OK wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:28:38 +0100, Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>begin oe_protect.scr
>>Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Microsoft cuts ANOTHER feature:
>>> full HD playback in 32bit Vista goes
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| By far the majority of PCs use 32-bit processors, because despite
>>>| AMD's efforts to push 64-bit CPUs into the marketplace early, Intel's
>>>| first widely-promoted 64-bit CPU is the just-released Core 2 Duo.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.apcstart.com/site/dwarne/2006/08/1139/microsoft-cuts-another-feature-full-hd-playback-in-32bit-vista
>>
>>And there will be no "unsigned" drivers allowed to run in 64-bit vista.
>>None. That means no support for /anything/ Microsoft doesn't want you,\
>
> You just expose your total ignorance of the topic. Learn about code
> signing before babbling total nonsense in public forums.
>
>>the customer, to have. No linux filesystems... Presumably, there'll be
>>no designing, building and using your own peripherals, either. Unless
>>I've read this wrongly, of course, but I don't think that I have.
>
> You cound not be wronger, actually.
>
>>What Microsoft appear to be about to do is to make the PC a fully locked
>>down appliance; all flexibility will be removed. There will be no
>>advantage to having a PC at all, indeed, you might as well just buy a
>>PS3 if you want to play high-definition movies. At least you'll be able
>>to play games as well.
>
> How pathetic. Typical babbling. Get something totally backwards, then
> build some major idiotic conjectures then go straight to conclusions.
>
> But what is code signing?
It's the Kelsey method.
Try and baffle them with twisted words, sub threads, side arguments and so
forth instead of actually addressing the topic.
|
|
