The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
<snip all/>
You have all been replying to a troll.
Flatfish < http://tinyurl.com/fhu3a > pretends to be someone from my
University.
Possibly, cognitive dissonance with respect to what he has to say,
doesn't advance Linux one iota..
There are many many deep and intractable problems with windows.
True
There are some deep, but less intractable ones with Linux.
True
Why not freely admit the issues and get on with fixing them?
They get fixed whether trolls comment on them or not, in fact a lot of
the stuff trolls complain about have either already been fixed or were
never problems in the first place.
Rather than denying that Linux is anything less than perfect, which is
simply useless as a stance.
Linux isn't perfect, it will probably never be perfect. The point here
though is what the trolls say.
Take the troll who began this thread, he didn't comment on a problem
with linux that needs fixing.
He took one fact, that linux has small market share on the desktop and
used it to imply that linux is not worth using.
Why should we even bother to debate with him? Or you?
|
|
