"cc" <scatnubbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Linonut wrote:
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Culley belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>> Toplist of Idiots
>>
>> > Pos Poster Msgs Bytes Quoted
>> > 2. Hadron Quark - IMBECILE 145 197390 77%
>> > 4. snit - IDIOT 125 315799 67%
>> > 10. "cc" - TROLL 62 195361 90%
>> > 29. amicus_curious - TROLL 25 80893 59%
>> > 30. Ian Semmel - WINTROLL / IDIOT 23 25957 66%
>>
>> In my opinion, for this week.
>>
>> Snit actually had some good moments, though, and cc isn't too bad.
>
> Awww thank you for the backhanded compliment Linonut.
>
>> (Does anyone care?)
>
> Does it bother you are only the 27th Top Quality Poster?
>
> 7 is 25th and I could write a script to generate every single one of
> his posts (mention windopz, microshaft, and end with a link to a live
> cd site).
>
> chrisv is 12th, and all he does is call people idiots.
>
> Doug Menothol is 3rd and he posts off topic about patents all day long.
>
>
> Roy S. is 1st when all he does is post links and maybe a line of
> commentary.
>
>
> So to answer your question, no, no one cares about these stupid
> statistics.
>
I suppose they are worth a laugh just to see the COLA gang savaging each
other : I mean, how would you like to be Linonut only to discover that
the "quality" of your input is less than that of (chuckle) Chrisv?
Linonut is a good bloke I think : unlike the others I think he at least
user LInux and understands it. KÃhlmann, Lent et al just say "Linux is
great" without any apparent experience of using it for anything other
than reaching wood.
|
|
