Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Tom Yager: At present, it sucks to be Steve Ballmer

  • Subject: Re: [News] Tom Yager: At present, it sucks to be Steve Ballmer
  • From: "amicus_curious" <ACDC@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:38:07 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Usenet Monster - http://www.usenetmonster.com
  • References: <3049393.izESJH1WMy@schestowitz.com>
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:469638
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:3049393.izESJH1WMy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Payback time for Novell
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | As for the payment made by Novell, it validates the arrangement as
> | a business contract by setting up an exchange of consideration. I'm
> | not a lawyer, but I believe that if Microsoft just handed a bouquet
> | over to Novell to prevent Novell v. Microsoft, Microsoft could later
> | welsh on the deal by contesting the alleged misdeeds that Novell used
> | as leverage. This is all conjecture, of course, but two absolute
> | truths remain: Payback is, indeed, a bitch, and Microsoft is
> | entitled to a share. And at present, it sucks to be Steve Ballmer.
> `----
>
> http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1405242481;fp;2;fpid;3

It is hard to fathom this conclusion, in my opinion.  I would gladly trade 
my situation for his.  Have you seen his boat? 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index