NoStop <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:12:44 +0100, Roy Culley wrote:
>>
>>> Well I don't. If the subject interests me then I'll read it. I reckon
>>> Erik reads every one of Roy's posts. Look how soon he pounces on them.
>>
>> I don't read all of them. I only read the ones that appear to have
>> obviously fraudulent headlines (which is a lot of them).
>>
> What makes you think you're supposed to be the judge here on COLA? Fucking
> pompous asshole.
He isn't. He reads the one with fraudulent headers.
>
>>> As a long time subscriber to COLA I appreciate Roy's [News] posts.
>>
>> I suspect you only appreciate them because they annoy me. Anything that
>> annoys me is A-OK in your book, regardless of whether they are appropriate
>> or even true.
>>
> You place far too much importance in yourself. Most of us would rather that
> you just went away. I know, MickeyMouse is probably paying you minimum
> wage
Who is "us"? Who is Mickeymouse in this context and why would he be
paying Erik?
> to pollute this newsgroup. But surely you can find another job. Just
> memorize this ... "will that be french fries with your burger?" ... and you
> should make out ok.
<embarrassed silence>
Hilarious. Not. Are you 8 years old?
>
>
>>> I
>>> don't spend my day surfing the web for interesting articles or
>>> subscribing to rss feeds. Roy does the filtering of the crud for what
>>> he thinks will be interesting to Linux advocates. He does an
>>> exceptional job as far as I'm concerned.
>>
>> Which is why you don't read many of his posts... right...
>
> Again, please just fuck off.
Kier? Is that you?
|
|