__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Monday 11 December 2006 12:53 \__
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> cc wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright sure, I can see that. But by the same token, not many of us are
>>> reading all your posts to begin with, and we still find them. Anyway,
>>> my main point was, that having both a digest and all your original News
>>> posts is repetative, and harmful. No one who discusses your news
>>> articles and points out any flaws(intentional or not) is going to come
>>> back and do the same thing here for the digest. And vice versa. Why not
>>> just have one or the other so at least anyone reading the news posts
>>> can see the criticism/corrections as well?
>>>
>> Because a digest of the news posts was requested by Hadron Quark.
>>
>> I really don't know why he thought a digest was a good idea, but Mark
>> kindly provided one for him.
>
> Absolutely correct - I hadn't even considered it until Mr Quark
> suggested the idea. Timmy helped by offering some guidance with respect
> to formatting it, too. It just goes to show that cooperation can
> cross all kinds of barriers, doesn't it?
It's kind of like a man on death row choosing the weapon with which execution
is to take place, instead of choosing that last meal. Okay, that was a
morbid analogy, but clearly it wasn't their intention to have something
delivered for which they now have regrets. We used to give Novell our
support, no?
--
~~ Kind greetings and happy holidays!
Roy S. Schestowitz | $> apt-get -not windows
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 20.9% user, 2.9% system, 1.0% nice, 75.2% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
