begin risky.vbs
<i6tk64-abv.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sinister Midget <phydeaux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2006-12-31, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>
>> Once again Roy is in flagrant disregard of copyright, and is doing
>> so in more than one way.
>>
>> [snip]
>
> Did you get permission to reproduce that? Is this "your own
> personal, non-commercial use" or are you doing this on behalf of
> someone or some thing that brings monetary renumeration to you?
Nice one Sinister. If, and its a huge if, Erik had any credibility
left in anyones eyes he's lost it now. These personal attacks against
Roy are truly pathetic.
>> So let's review the violations, shall we?
>
> 1) Erik violated that which he wants to accuse others of violating.
2006 will go down as the year Erik made a complete and utter laughing
stock out of himself. I was going to say its all downhill from here
Erik but you are already at rock bottom.
--
Security is one of those funny things. You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing. A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else. Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006
|
|
