Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Basic postprocessing of a scanned image?

  • Subject: Re: Basic postprocessing of a scanned image?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:25:15 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.gimp
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <drsuc1$bfp$1@gwdu112.gwdg.de> <43e20025$0$6976$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [bugbear] on Thursday 02 February 2006 12:50 \__

> Anton81 wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I don't know much about image processing or Gimp, but I'd like to enhance
>> scans in some way.
>> 
>> Can someone give me advice for Gimp or references how to do:
>> 
>> - remove speckles
> 
> Filters->Enhance->Despeckle
> 
>> - remove below a threshold (i.e. remove opposite page shining through)
> 
> Layer->Colours->Levels
> 
>> - "discretize" gray scales (i.e. make all sort of black text really black)
> 
> Layer->Colours->Levels
> 
>> - adjust faulty scanner colour sensitivity
> 
> Well, all that kind of thing is really under the moster heading
> of:
> 
> Layer->Colours->Curves.
> 
> But using it is hard to do well.
> 
> http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/index.html
> 
> Try chapter 6
> 
>    BugBear

This can probably be wrapped up as a Script-Fu (or Python). I would be
interested in knowing if this can be made scriptable from the command-line
too. I have plenty of photo albums scanned and I could use some automated
refinement of these. Choice of colours (via curves), levels and the like
make this approach entail a manual labour requirement, so I hope choices can
be made independently, which prevent this from being semi-automatic.

I tend to prefer ImageMagick at times as, while it is not as flexible, it can
handle batch-processing rather well.

Roy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index