Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: McDar showing IBL's in sync with each other

  • Subject: Re: McDar showing IBL's in sync with each other
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:20:47 +0000
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <t7rcv19t4bis8ujbbhqn5g5u9espvvun1m@4ax.com> <op.s44877zs26l578@borek> <smscv1p5muut6n7ln5d7p8qdmhch78ssjk@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [Paul B] on Saturday 18 February 2006 01:06 \__

> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:03:33 +0100, Borek
> <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:42:05 +0100, Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> All working DC's shown on McDar are now in sync with each other at
>>> last. Could be a good sign of the PR being on the horizon.
>>
>>It have already happened several times in the past weeks - and no update
>>followed.
> 
> Yes, but not totally in sync. Either the wrong PR was showing, or
> wrong IBL's
> 
> This is the first time in a while since everything is in sync. :)
> 
>>But they are in sync for me too.
> 
> I know, I already looked ;)

I would have thought that an update is said to be triggered when they go
unaligned. If they are aligned, it implies stability. In other words, they
are static, no flux.

Roy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index