OK wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:00:37 -0700, Au79 <au79@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>OK wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 21:33:08 GMT, 7
>>> <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | Who woulda thunk it? The new Office 2007 Preview online demo is
>>>>> | being served up from an Apache/Linux box!
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.kerika.com/2006/06/office-on-linux.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I think they finally got the facts right.
>>>>
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!
>>>
>>> Yes it's hilarious! I really like the part that says "[the site]
>>> promptly died, presumably from the unexpectedly large traffic
>>> generated by the CNET story"
>>>
>>> Typical Linux system at work, I presume, can't handle the load ;-)
>>
>>Interestingly enough, Microsoft had greater faith in Apache/Linux than its
>>own crapware when setting up the site.
>
> No, they just outsourced the demo and picked the wrong partner.
Q: How retarded could a multi-billion dollar company be?
A: Maybe they really know what they're doing and were o.k. to prefer Linux.
--
...................
http://www.vanwensveen.nl/rants/microsoft/IhateMS.html
|
|
