__/ [ canadafred ] on Sunday 16 July 2006 19:14 \__
> John wrote:
>> "canadafred" <canadian_web@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1153049504.991655.94770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> >> __/ [ John ] on Saturday 15 July 2006 23:56 \__
>> >>
>> >> > After the latest PR update I found that all my inter pages dropped
>> >> > to zero.
>> >> > Thinking it would adjust the next day I didn't give it much thought.
>> >> > They
>> >> > are still sitting at zero so I went to copyscape and put in one of my
>> >> > pages, http://www.cjsealing.com/faq.htm
>> >> > Much to my surprise, http://www.prosealers.ca/faq.htm ... This page
>> >> > has
>> >> > 398 words matching your text, as hightlighted below by Copyscape.
>> >> > My serps, I don't even what to talk about them.
>> >> > Maybe I should have introduced myself before ranting. Hi, my name is
>> >> > John
>> >> > and have been lurking for over a year now. I know plagiarism is not
>> >> > my only
>> >> > problem, some 301's wouldn't hurt along with a few other details.
>> >> > It's not
>> >> > an SEO site just a small business site where my customers can go to
>> >> > get some info. I guess I can take some comfort in the fact the Yahoo
>> >> > and MSN
>> >> > still love me. You type in driveway sealing and I'm still #1. My
>> >> > sons' name
>> >> > is Chris, hence the CJ. Like I said it just a small business, father
>> >> > & son
>> >> > with some help from my wife.
>> >>
>> >> Hi John,
>> >>
>> >> ...Nice to unveil the story behind one's name, especially as
>> >> lurkers' presence is rarely felt. *smile*
>> >>
>> >> I suggest that you follow John B.'s advice, but do not spend
>> >> too much time on it, particularly if only a single page was
>> >> partly copied. The process can be rather cumbersome once
>> >> started. I have given up on spam reports once I discovered
>> >> how unfruitful they usually are (a lot of SPAM and
>> >> plagiarism is even automated, which makes it a
>> >> brute-force/Windows botnet 'thing'; thus it's impossible for
>> >> humans to keep up with pace). But not everyone agrees with
>> >> this assertion... I just find new filtering methods, but
>> >> it's unlikely to work for content that continues to stand
>> >> rather than be deleted.
>> >
>> > Hi John, Roy, John B and all others
>> >
>> > I think John the OP has two issues
>> >
>> > 1: Copyright infringement
>> >
>> > Anyone who has ever written anything on the Internet opens up to this
>> > reality. Content is replicated, duplicated, editing, shuffled around,
>> > mixed up with all kinds of other agendas and pumped back out at such a
>> > volume as to make any notion of protecting an author's due rights to
>> > his own material a useless, futile pursuit.
>> >
>> > The question of whether these types of copyright infringement practices
>> > are right or wrong no longer has meaning in this world.
>> >
>> > 2. John the OP has a bunch of PR0 web pages now. Hey, so do I. As a
>> > matter of fact I now have a web site whereas all the web pages except
>> > the Entrance page has a PRO. I am somewhat panicking too as I absorb
>> > the serious shit-kicking the web site is getting in the SERPs at this
>> > time as well. But experience has taught me to hold on. I am forced to
>> > have another look at the code, check my internal navigation system, the
>> > web site's architecture, did I snag some new spam BackLinks that need
>> > to be shaken off ... on and on the process revolves through the peaks
>> > and valleys of a meaningful web site's life.
>> >
>> > If you are planning to continue chasing top positions in meaningful
>> > competitive keyphrase arenas then you'll have to develop a thick skin
>> > and exceed your present limitations in patience, perserverance,
>> > innovativeness and resilience.
>> >
>> > Maybe start from the beginning again :
>> > http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/search-engine-marketing.htm
>>
>> I want to thank all of you for the advise, the shoulder to cry on, and
>> for
>> the good read Fred. I guess I will take advantage of the situation and
>> redo the whole site. I will keep in mind what everyone here has taught me
>> over the last year or so, validation, 301's, ext.
>
> You are welcome John. That's what we are intended to do here,
> sometimes.
>
> See, my meaningless endless dribble has finally served a purpose in
> someone else's life after all.
Dribble or drivel? Or both? *smile*
Best wishes,
Roy
|
|
