flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:25:14 -0700, T.G.Reaper wrote:
>
>>
>> Why can't Linux advocates be honest and just admit what is so
>> obviously and clearly true: this claim that "it's
>> difficult/impractical to use Windows XP without admin rights" it
>> totally bogus, false, and unsupportable?
>
> Key words: "Linux Advocates" and Honest....used in the same sentence.
> Even the honest ones, (that's not you Roy Shysterwitch) won't step up to
> the plate and break ranks.
> Take a look at the crap Ballard spews.
Hey, I'm a "Linux Advocate," and I'm honest, and no, I don't know a single
Windows [NT,2K,XP] user that can use it without admin privileges. (And no,
sorry, claims on this NG do not count)
>
> Jedi?
> Yet another weirdo who seems to think he knows something about digital
> audio despite getting trounced every time he makes the mistake of
> x-posting to rec.audio.pro.
>
> Any Linux advocates challenge these people?
> How about "7" ?
> Another oddball who seems to be an expert in misspelling words.
> Roy Culley?
> Twisted stats, yet how many Linux advocates complain about him
> interjecting his own (99.99 percent wrong) opinions into what he posts as
> *real and accurate stats*.
> Any Linux advocate complaining about him?
> He, along with Ballard, 7 and Shysterwitch are in effect making the rest
> of the good advocates look like idiots, but they still will not break
> ranks.
> They just go around with blinders on thinking all is well, when it is not.
>
> Nahh...most of the so called Linux advocates in this group have some
> serious social issues.
Personal insults aside, what else do you have?
|
|
