__/ [ 7 ] on Saturday 15 July 2006 15:56 \__
> Roy Culley wrote:
>
>> begin risky.vbs
>> <44B8B96F.1060705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Robert Newson <ReapNewsB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have a look:
>>>>
>>>>
http://news.com.com/5208-12-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=19322&messageID=165223&start=-1
>>>
>>> http://video.msn.com was running Microsoft-IIS on Linux when last
>>> queried at 15-Jul-2006 09:41:56 GMT
>>>
>>> OS Server Last changed IP address Netblock Owner
>>> Linux Microsoft-IIS/6.0 15-Jul-2006 84.45.224.8 ...
>>>
>>> Is MS-IIS/6.0 really available for Linux?
>>
>> It means they are using a Linux reverse proxy servers to handle the
>> load because IIS can't. MS do this a lot. Remember Akamai?
>
>
> WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!
>
> So when it comes to real work you are better
> off buying into a Linux distro.
True. This looks grim for a monopolist who takes pride in technical
superiority. Not only does it choose Linux. You must also remember that
Microsoft has _NO ACQUISITION COSTS_ for Windows. It means that Linux wins
on performance and not only TCO. Also see the reference (in the link above)
to the WIreless routers that run Linux and help Redmond comminute.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "These characters were randomly picked"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
64 bytes from banana.catalyst2.com (84.18.207.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
