On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:08:51 -0500, Linonut wrote:
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On 13 Jul 2006 08:04:39 -0700, nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>> My god, now you're claiming to be PJ's "source" for her news items?
>>>
>>> He is on some of them. I suggested that he send his news catches to
>>> PJ, since she has a news column and probably a much bigger readership
>>> than cola. (For one thing, groklaw is moderated, and impolite behavior
>>> is not allowed. It makes it a much more pleasant experience to read.)
>>> It was a way of magnifying the impact of Roy's work. PJ is now posting
>>> some of Roy's news items.
>>
>> Funny, but a search of Groklaw for Schestowitz returns nothing:
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/search.php?query=Schestowitz&keyType=phrase&datestart=&dateend=&topic=0&type=all&author=0&mode=search
>>
>> A search of google, limited to Groklaw also turns up nothing:
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Schestowitz&num=10&hl=en&c2coff=1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=groklaw.net&as_rights=&safe=images
>
> Why do you assume his groklaw name contains Schestowitz?
>
> Mine doesn't include Ahlstrom.
Because he's so vain that he has to use his name everywhere. For instance,
his Digg username is Schestowitz.
|
|
