Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:21:32 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>
>> On 2006-07-13, nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>>> My god, now you're claiming to be PJ's "source" for her news items?
>>>
>>> He is on some of them. I suggested that he send his news catches to
>>> PJ, since she has a news column and probably a much bigger readership
>>> than cola. (For one thing, groklaw is moderated, and impolite behavior
>>> is not allowed. It makes it a much more pleasant experience to read.)
>>> It was a way of magnifying the impact of Roy's work. PJ is now posting
>>> some of Roy's news items.
>>
>> Erik FUDsucker can't believe anybody here may have some impact
>> elsewhere. He doesn't have any. No reason to believe anybody else
>> might.
>>
>> Why do you think he attacks Roy and Rex so vehemently. If they were
>> kooks and whackjobs he could leave them alone and they'd eventually
>> whither away. His fear is that they _won't_ disappear, and what they
>> have to say may have real impact. So he has to find cheapshot ways too
>> attack them.
>>
>> Including intentional attempts at character assassination and false
>> claims of making shit up or "stealing" others' property, wherever and
>> whenever possible.
>
>Wow, so that explains your obsession with me.
Erroneous presupposition of an "obsession".
>You do realize that your own behavior echoes exactly what you are
>projecting onto me, right?
Wrong, as usual.
|
|
