Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linux Security Appliance Swats Windows SPAM

  • Subject: Re: Linux Security Appliance Swats Windows SPAM
  • From: Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:25:52 -0700
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Erisian claw
  • References: <2463460.iJz6WlRAZp@schestowitz.com> <1152683285.980829.308110@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1127804
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11 Jul 2006 22:48:06 -0700,
 NoNamer <grug2005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Based on a hardened Linux kernel, the Mailgate 6500 protects
>> | corporate systems from e-mail-borne threats with features such as
>> | Virus Outbreak Protection, which uses pattern detection to identify new
>> | virus attacks even before antivirus companies release signatures, the
>> | company says. The appliance also blocks 99% of spam coming across
>> | e-mail channels in multiple languages.
>> `----
>>
>>         http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=1570657632&rid=-50
>>
>> Q: Where does it all come from anyway?
>>
>> ,----[ A: ]
>> | Four-fifths of spam now emanates from computers contaminated with
>> | Trojan horse infections, according to a study by network management
>> | firm Sandvine out this week. Trojans and worms with backdoor components
>> | uch as Migmaf and SoBig have turned infected Windows PCs into drones in
>> | vast networks of compromised zombie PCs.
>> `----
>>
>>                 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/04/trojan_spam_study/
>
> Is this really news?  A decent firewall can easily do this.  No need
> for Linux - which in itself can introduce unknown security issues.
>
> Just look at the list of all the recent security bulletins for Linux to
> confirm this.

Do you have an example relevent to a firewall box? 

>
> Sorry, but if I *really* care about security, I'll be using a full
> fledged hardware solution dedicated to its job.
>

Are you under the impression that a "hardware solution" won't have
security issues? 

> As for using Windows as my OS of choice, I boot using a
> non-administrative user when browsing the web to unknown sites, and I
> have my firewall turned on.  No problems at all.  (I know most of the
> population uses the default settings - which is not enough) - Vista
> addresses this in spades, however.
>

Assuming it ever ships.... in which case, MS will have finally caught up
to Linux, ca 2000...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEtJXwd90bcYOAWPYRAl2+AJ9g9hi+ZsoXDqQHhqPtDIOlw35efACg0Yki
uZDJow3f//k8Oh60xYoRUZE=
=swFg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Jim Richardson     http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
We have only two things to worry about--either that things will never
get back to normal, or that they already have.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index