On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:02:10 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote:
>
> Due to another reply I saw the last "yah boo words". Response below.
>
> yttrx@xxxxxxxxx (yttrx) writes:
>
>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>> Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>>>> Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> yttrx@xxxxxxxxx (yttrx) writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For my next trick, I can tell you why ethernet addresses are not
>>>>>>>> addresses at all (they do not tell you where things are!), or why you
>>>>>>>> need only and exactly three networking modes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't do "pretty bit talk", btw, I do "like it is" talk, which is why,
>>>>>>>> amongst other things, the client/server model most people use I find
>>>>>>>> irritating at best.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip usual troll abuse>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is "troll" a definition for anyone who might disagree with you?
>>>
>>> No, that's why I didn't say that.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip more troll abuse> A very unique ability to
>>>>>> complicate the most basic technological concepts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like what? If you don't understand something, be all means let me know,
>>>>> and I can try to explain. I can't promise that you'll understand, a lot
>>>>> of people find new concepts difficult, but I'll try my best.
>>>>
>>> <snip inaccurate stuff about my opinion>
>
> Heh : more context snipping to further your own blowhard views.
>
>>>>
>>>> The fact that you think a "network" can exist as an entity without peers
>>>> using it <snip yet more abuse>
>
> Abuse? So I was right. Anyone that either corrects you or disagrees with
> you is abusing or trolling. You need to get out more.
>
>>>
>>> I said that the network was made up of peers working across server layers,
>>> clearly you didn't grasp that. I went on to say that the use of the
>
> server "layers now" is it? But I wouldnt know. YOu keep snipping things
> and talking total bullshit about protocols. I noticed you wriggled out
> of that little corner fairly sharpish.
>
>>> term "server" in the computing world, whilst reasonable in some
>>> namespaces, makes comprehending networking very difficult - something
>>> which you seem to be proving very well here.
>
> Only to you. It is fairly straightforward to anyone not interested in
> obfuscating a subject to make oneself appear a demi-god. remember : in
> the valley of the blind etc etc.
>
>>>
>>> I don't know why you seem so keen to tell me what I'm thinking, you'd do
>>> better to understand what I'm saying, or at least, try to.
>>>
>
> And yet it was you doing the lecturing. You need to recalibrate your
> arrogance fuse.
Looks like he's been so far up Roy Schestowich's arse lately that he is
absorbing some of Schestowichs;s bad traits.
Arrogance being one of them
|
|
