__/ [ yttrx ] on Friday 28 July 2006 18:27 \__
> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>> You're a pirate apologist, and you're clearly advocating the
>>> pirating of windows software, I suspect, because you have no regard
>>> or respect for the people who write it.
>>
>> I suspect that you're an idiot. Explain exactly how I am advocating
>> piracy by drawing a distinction between hacking and theft.
>>
>
> You're attempting to rationalize piracy--you're not talking about
> hacking here. Installing a cracked serial number is not hacking.
>
> Sorry charlie, yaint as smert as ya think yar, are ya.
>
> You're rationalizing piracy instead of just having the nuts to come
> right out and say YEAH, IM A PIRATE, YARR.
>
> No nuts. That's you.
>
>>>> I remember often using "cracks" on legitimate software; e.g. to
>>>> enable playing games without repeatedly swapping in and out the
>>>> install disks (a process that has now been refined using the
>>>> so-called "mini-ISO" method).
>>
>>> Yes, but thats not necessary with dreaweaver.
>>
>> Well the author of that article seems to think otherwise.
>>
>
> No, he doesn't. In fact he never mentioned the details that
> you did, and now youre just making shit up.
>
>>> Wrong. You can either apply a legitimate license key--or you can
>>> apply a cracked license key. Have you ever actually used
>>> dreamweaver?
>>
>> Have *you* ever actually used Dreamweaver under Wine, without using
>> the cracked binary? I'm sure the author would welcome your /extensive/
>> experience.
>>
>
> The author SAYS YOU DONT HAVE TO USE THE CRACKED BINARY, ASSHOLE...
*Plonk*
> HE SUGGESTS CRACKING IT IF YOU *HAVE* TO, NOT BECAUSE YOU *NEED*
> TO.
>
> Get it yet?
>
> And yes, I've used dreamweaver under wine WITHOUT USING A CRACKED
> binary, and to be brutally frank, it sucks ass.
|
|
