Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Ballmer Admits Failures, Apologetic Towards Investors

  • Subject: Re: [News] Ballmer Admits Failures, Apologetic Towards Investors
  • From: arachnid <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:20:45 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <11427840.bYacEUg6QJ@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1133949
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:44:16 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> Ballmer to Wall St: we always back a winner
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | At about this point, investors must have been hankering for the security
> | of Office, and client and server operating systems. With Windows Vista
> | bedevilled by delays, Ballmer promised: "We will never repeat this
> | experience with Windows again. We will never have a five-year gap
> | between flagship products."

Next time it'll be 7 years?

> | 
> | Pressed to explain what the company has done to avoid delays, Ballmer
> | said - chiefly - it had learned the classic lesson of promising too much
> | in one go. He said he shared this mistake jointly with Bill Gates,
> | Craig Mundie chief research and strategy officer and Jim Allchin, 
> | co-president for platforms and services. "We tried to incubate too many
> | new things and integrate them simultaneously rather than let them bake.

In other words, Microsoft tried to innovate - and discovered they
don't know how.

> | There was too much complexity. We worked down that path for a while and
> | said it wouldn't work. We re-booted where we were.

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/28/ballmer_multicore_investments/

> That last line opens the door to many jokes.

Microsoft BSOD'd?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index