On Tuesday 25 July 2006 05:43 flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:30:08 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> __/ [ Brad ] on Tuesday 25 July 2006 02:36 \__
>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:07:17 -0500, George Ellison wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'd offer sympathy, but really its your own damn fault for running XP
>>>> in the first place.
>>>
>>> All I can do is sit here and nod in agreement....with a large knowing
>>> grin on my face. :-)
>>
>> Same here. Data transfers are actually what broke the camel's back and
>> had me wipe off Windows from everywhere (even a second partition).
>> Windows is not even capable of doing /transfers/ reliably and
>> consistently.
>
>
> Yea sure......
>
> Maybe you can explain why USB transfers suck using
> Suse.......................
>
> ;I could sneaker-net the files faster...
> http://www.cybertechhelp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=121315
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=usb%2Btransfer%2Bslow%2Bsuse&btnG=Google+Search
"Hello - has anyone tested if beta1 of 10.1 has corrected sync operation
slowdown for USB back to normal high speed rate? This is rated as critical
in bugzilla, so I'm curious if anyone can relay results"
"As of July 2006 it has been fixed:-) Thanks god. And not only that, 10.1
release seems very nice and user friendly. Even more than 10.0. I just
installed it yesterday and love it"
> Take a hike asshole..........
HTH....
|
|
