Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Counting the costs of proprietary software on the desktop

__/ [ The Ghost In The Machine ] on Monday 24 July 2006 16:00 \__

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, billwg
> <billw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote
> on Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:32:47 GMT
> <zEMwg.2772$ik6.2583@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:2019919.Ys0LZeIfOA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> could this be proof that software is the most important part of a
>>>> computer? it makes up >50% of the total cost in the last example.
>>>> maybe bill gates was right!!
>>>
>>> Gates said that the cost of hardware would decline. Sadly, the
>>> price of his software has only gone up. It's either greed or
>>> the simply the advantage of suppressing all competition
>>> (monopoly), which makes it an abuse of the market. If you need
>>> good software, however, you must settle for the
>>> best there is on the market...
>>>
>> You dweebs seem to be hung up on the cost of things rather than the
>> value of things.  Hardware has some value and software has some value.
>> Do you think that the providers of this value do not merit their
>> compensation?  You are a bunch of freeloaders wishing and hoping and
>> even insisting that your needs supersede all else.  Good luck!
>>
> 
> Define "value".

In Linux, it's val-you. To Microsoft, it's val-us. It's about the vendor, not
the user/customer. WGA installtion, extortionate pricing, decisions
arrogantly made on behalf of users, etc.

Roy
 
-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | UNIX: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 131 total,   3 running, 127 sleeping,   0 stopped,   1 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index