After takin' a swig o' grog, OK belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> On 22 Jul 2006 15:07:44 -0700, hanumizzle@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>
>>Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=13969
>>>
>>> Example screenshot:
>>>
>>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/pre2/13969-2.jpg
>>
>>But why?
>
> Because it's stunning
As in "dumbfounding".
> and because OSS falls very short on creativity
> as average Linux UIs looks like Delphi and VB apps from the early 90'
> or, at best, like 2001's XP (like the newly released SLED 10, half
> 90's, half XP, generally looking like it was designed by a 7 years
> old)
Wow. A more cogent example of ignorance, willful stupidty, and
unabashed petulance, I don't believe I have seen here for awhile.
> It's easier to copy Microsoft, like OSS did with every "desktop
> environments" so far, that to come up with innivative things :-)
>
> OSS needs a tail light to follow.
Now you're just being obstinately stupid, OK.
Actually, here it is Microsoft that is doing the catching up.
It is amazing, too. The dominant platform, yet always a couple of years
behind in eye-candy, and even further behind in networking and graphics
technology. The only reason Microsoft is in the game is because it is
a monopoly, and most people know only of Microsoft.
--
Real programmers don't use Visual Basic.
|
|
