Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ 7 ] on Saturday 22 July 2006 05:02 \__
>
>> arachnid wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:45:06 +0000, 7 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dual-booting Windows and Linux the easy way (Linux.com videos)
>>>>>
>>>>> An excellent step-by-step videos-based guide. There is no longer a
>>>>> reason to have any machine in the house/office which is Windows-only.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/20/1654251
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What it should go on to say is that micoshaft anti-trust convicted
>>>> OS's installer is a viral computer program. It unlawfully deletes
>>>> multi-boot information from your hard disk much like a virus
>>> <snip>
>
>
> I can't help thinking about something which I discovered the other day.
> When you tap on a Linux partition under Windows, the prompt suggests
> formatting it. I mean, _come on_! We live in a world where more than just
> one filesystem (or family thereof) exists. Could Windows programmers be
> any more aggressive?
Thanks Roy, that is also illegal for a monolopy to be doing.
There are new monopoly practices being invented every day,
and the regulator are just too slow and too sloppy to
do any real work when it comes to correcting distortions in
the market place affecting non-monopoly players.
Micoshaft asstrotufers and the like pointing the finger
at EULA is both illegal defence and meaningless.
The issues raised go beyond individual users.
Its all about market distortions.
>>> When are you guys going to get it through your heads that once you click
>>> "accept" on the installer's Windows EULA screen, it is no longer *your*
>>> computer? :o/
>>
>>
>> Market distortions are not acceptable from a convicted a monopoly.
>> Its not simply about 'your' computer.
|
|
