Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft Fundamentals to Disappoint Users

  • Subject: Re: [News] Microsoft Fundamentals to Disappoint Users
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:37:45 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Manchester University
  • References: <1411994.JuFKN0gxUB@schestowitz.com> <OhRvg.115166$A8.112505@clgrps12> <12c09qommaa4ra4@news.supernews.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Tim Smith ] on Friday 21 July 2006 02:01 \__

> In article <OhRvg.115166$A8.112505@clgrps12>, Oliver Wong wrote:
>>> Opinion: Why get a remote client (essentially a relic) when you can
>>> convert the same machine into a proper PC with a lot of software, for
>>> free?
>> 
>>     Remote clients seem like they are making a big comeback. Consider how
>>     much you (Roy) like web apps, for example.
> 
> For years, we've been hearing how remote clients were the way to go, and
> the
> PC was dead.  Now that Windows is going to have a remote client, the story
> changes and it is remote clients that are the relics.  Geesh!

Remote/thin  clients  are brilliant. Converting a  perfectly
acceptable  host  into  a  thin client (with  some  more  XP
'lipstick') and then praising it is like converting your GMC
into   a   livestock  van  rather  than  getting  the   free
refurbishment (Linux eq.) from the car dealership.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index