In comp.os.linux.advocacy, thad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<thad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
<e66vp4$qqp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> tab <trentallenblack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> They are money oriented, and Microsoft is eating them for lunch.
>> So they are FORCED to linux. I did not see them JUMP on board,
>> more like they are searching for a life boat.
>>
>> You think that is a victory?
>
> Heh, this is funny. It used to be that the Linux nay-sayers would
> complain about a lack of application vendors porting to Linux. Now
> that the really big names are moving, they attempt to discount and
> discredit those vendors.
>
> Linux is the 2nd place server OS with about a third of the market
> and growing fast. The only surprise here is that Symantic did not
> move sooner.
>
> But don't worry, Linux is dying. I read it on a Usenet post so it
> must be true. :)
Right next to the imminent demise of the Internet from <insert random
catastrophe here>, I think. :-)
>
> Thad
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
|
|
