__/ [ William Poaster ] on Friday 30 June 2006 00:45 \__
> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Fri, 30 Jun 2006
> 00:27:11 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Brad Sims <brad.m.sims@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> If you are still using the stable branch, the new devel betas are /Much/
>>> faster at binaries and threading, and use less memory.
>>>
>>> Still under heavy development, so give it a try.
>>>
>>> Unlike Slavery-ware, Free software gets better the more people who
>>> report bugs and request features. Ie it only has to be a feature people
>>> want/can make happen not what the Marketing Department says you have to
>>> settle for.
>>>
>>>
>> Are the new pan betas getting into the debian testing or unstable
>> repositories, would you know?
>
> See http://darrenalbers.com/Pan/
Isn't Pan kind of slow in terms of development these days? I asked in the
newsreaders newsgroup before and the impression I got is that I should have
no reason to switch. Pan looks sexy though, feature-wise.
Roy
PS - Sorry about phrasing, not sober at the moment.
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | England - 1 Ecuador - 0
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 20.2% user, 3.6% system, 17.2% nice, 59.0% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
