Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: E.U. v. MS - Looks bad?

  • Subject: Re: E.U. v. MS - Looks bad?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:36:59 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <4gct38F1n1ihcU1@individual.net> <pan.2006.06.27.15.18.01.253539@suseoss101.eu>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ William Poaster ] on Tuesday 27 June 2006 16:18 \__

> This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on  Tue, 27 Jun 2006
> 15:19:19 +0100, B Gruff wrote:
> 
>> The inside story seems to be that it's perhaps not going Microsoft's
>> way....
>> 
>> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/e6a1d618-0551-11db-9b9e-0000779e2340.html
>> 
>> As you can no doubt imagine, I really do sympathise with MS.......
> 
> Oh, yes, I'm...uh....<snicker>...sure....*cough*....you do....

One of the excepts which I came across this afternoon mentioned that some
draft was being written, which could indicate that Microsoft lose (it was
more explicit than phrases in the article above). You can get your hopes up
and MSFT down.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    England - 1  Ecuador - 0
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer ¦  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s):  20.3% user,   3.6% system,  17.8% nice,  58.3% idle
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index