In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Colin Day
<cday3@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:30:09 GMT
<lq0mg.81427$Lg.67402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> ,----[ Specs (snippets) ]
>> | - On board industrial and reduced Linux PC (em555) + RTai + SynDEX
>> | (real-time SDK) and very soon the robuBOX
>> |
>> | - control software :
>> | Serial command interpreter OR C++ Linux librairies to control the
>> | robot from any linux+rtai application (host PC) OR using SynDEX
>> | real-time low-level dev. toolkit (REQUIRES TRAINING SESSION)
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.robosoft.fr/robuROC6.html
>
> Powered by Linux? Wow! free energy! Our problems are solved! :-)
>
> Colin Day
Well, I'm not sure we should go *that* far, but at one point Linux was
definitely more energy-efficient than Win95. :-)
I would hope it is also more energy-efficient than WinXP, but at least
NT knew how to halt (and not in the sense of "freeze up and wait for
the three-fingered salute", either -- though it did that too :-) ).
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
|
|
