On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:28:28 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Black Dragon ] on Sunday 05 March 2006 13:54 \__
>
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, a few other archives ignore the "X-No-Archive" header, that's why
>>> it's a waste of time!
>>
>> Since you're claiming XNA is "a waste of time", why then do you and
>> several other cola regulars always make such a big fuss about it?
>>
>> Does anybody besides me miss the old DejaNews? I think what Google has
>> done with the Usenet archives is utterly deplorable. :-(
>
> It's not just the archives, BD. A more worrisome fact is that they slowly
> convert UseNet into 'Google Chat'. That is most definitely the bigger
> issue. Do not expect quotes and attributions when Google takes over the
> world, communication included.
It's also a waste of time, because anyone replying to them still records
their post. IMO we aren't the ones bothered about XNA, but they are or why
else would they use it?
--
SuSE 10.1 OSS Beta3 (Agama Lizard)
|
|
