Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Iframe - does google index inframes ?

  • Subject: Re: Iframe - does google index inframes ?
  • From: John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 13 Mar 2006 09:59:04 GMT
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: Castle Amber - software development
  • References: <44148032$0$909$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk> <e0s912920se1jo5abnha0n4ul75frjj6cq@4ax.com> <Xns978520924396Ccastleamber@130.133.1.4> <dv3dnp$v59$2@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • User-agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.internet.search-engines:79458
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> __/ [ John Bokma ] on Monday 13 March 2006 09:12 \__
> 
>> David <seodave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> No, the iFrame content (the HTML page you'll have the image within)
>>> is not seen by spiders.
>> 
>> That's new to me, and I can't think of any reason why it can't be
>> seen, since I can write a spider in 10 minutes that has no problem in
>> doing so, I mean:
>> 
>> <iframe src="pages.html"
>>              ^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>> it's not that hard to follow such a thingy, and hence I doubt this
>> statement :-D. (WB BTW)
> 
> I suspect that David may be right. I have just tested the following
> page for iframes indexing with Google.
> 
> http://www.schestowitz.com/wp2-test/
> 
> The outcome was negative despite the PageRank 2, which should have
> been sufficient to warrant indexing. I think a larger experiment is
> needed to confirm this...

Ok, I will see if I can set up an experiment. Out of curiousity. But 
beware that what doesn't work today, might work tomorrow. Like I said, 
it's not that hard to parse & handle an iframe.

-- 
John

Net::Google and Perl:          http://johnbokma.com/perl/net-google.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index