Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Google Trends

__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 12 May 2006 22:03 \__

> On Fri, 12 May 2006 21:31:30 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 12 May 2006 21:24 \__
>>
>>> On Fri, 12 May 2006 22:18:13 +0200, tonnie <t.prasing@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>John Bokma wrote:
>>>>> Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>Dunno if it has been mentioned in here before, but some may find this
>>>>>>of use :
>>>>>>http://www.google.com/trends
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yup
>>>>
>>>>I presume both and agree.
>>> 
>>> I was trying to work that out too <g>
>>
>>I think that I have finally figured out the effect of using "google" as a
>>synonym for "search".
>>
>>http://www.google.com/trends?q=google%2C+search&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all
>>
>>*silly grin*
> 
> <g>
> 
> Cairo Egypt is tops for "sex"
> Whereas Birmingham [United Kingdom] is tops for porn.

Yes, I heard that one in a different newsgroup. Manchester is a close second,
if I recall correctly. Thank goodness for the dignity.

Can you imagine the outrage that such cultural pattern exposure might beg for
in the East? Google Trends can be used to support racism, prejudice,
military agendas, intelligence, etc. I wonder who's up for "democracy"... (I
will not check, I promise! It's too addictive once you get started,
exploring laterally and refining the query)

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer ¦  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  4:30pm  up 15 days 23:27,  12 users,  load average: 1.56, 1.40, 1.00
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index