__/ [ Linonut ] on Saturday 13 May 2006 21:41 \__
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> In article <53egj3-uju.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> wrote:
>>> Bobbie <bobbie4(remove-this)@shaw.ca> did eloquently scribble:
>>>> Well I took spike1's advise (I tried the bittorrent web page and nada, a
>>>> FAQ but not much else) and opened ports 6880 to 6980.
>> ...
>>> You're welcome... Before slagging off a program... Look it up and ask
>>> first.
>>>:)
>>
>> Or slag it for the right reason. Needing to open 100 ports sucks.
>
> How else are you going to connect to a 100 peers, though?
Same port. Like pipelining in HTTP. TCP packers, as in any other case, have
layers below port number. That aside, isn't a connection to 100 peers make
him somewhat of a lamer (hacker's terminology)?
http://www.answers.com/topic/lamer
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:15am up 16 days 11:12, 11 users, load average: 1.13, 0.99, 0.70
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
